How To Escape Beginner Hell (In 3-6 Months)
as a writer/creator.
This time one year ago I was in beginner hell.
For those who don’t know, beginner hell is that first 3-6 month period as a writer or a creator, an entrepreneur, an artist, or somebody looking to do meaningful creative work and maybe earn a side-income from, where you just feel fucking lost.
No idea what you are doing.
No engagement.
No subscribers.
No tribe of people to support your body of work.
Your personal brand is invisible.
Your content feels like it’s screaming out into the void.
You question your own sanity with your morning americano, while you sit down to write before your day job, when every long-form post you publish gets only 5 likes (3 of them coming from friends and family).
Most people give up just before they develop the skills necessary to strike gold.
And you only need to strike gold once to escape beginner hell for good.
If you’re smart, you might be thinking:
Is this just a transformation that creative people keep being sold by gurus who are half-decent at marketing?
Who promise you can write about your interests online, build an audience doing so, and even earn from it... who themselves have never written about anything other than “how to grow an audience” in their content?
I am proof that this is not true.
And I’m going to give you everything I can to help you.
In this essay I want to do some profound thinking alongside you. Specifically, about why beginner hell exists, what exactly keeps most people stuck there from anywhere between 3 months to an entire lifetime... and the full plan for escaping it.
In 3-6 months.
Like how I did, starting from zero, with no audience, no writing experience, and no fucking clue what I was doing.
A lot has changed since then :)
Let’s begin!
I - The Content Abyss
If you really look closely, most overnight successes took a long time.
- Steve Jobs.
Beginner hell is really just a knowledge problem.
How so?
There is a small gap in your understanding that is stopping you from making the right actions.
It’s a skill issue.
Because is it not knowledge that dictates your actions? And actions are what will launch you out of beginner hell, will they not?
If you can fill that gap, and change you how act even just a little, you will launch yourself out of beginner hell, and into the next phase of your skill development.
I write one essay each week.
It’s my Substack newsletter. The word “essay” sounds less salesy to me.
I spend 30-60 minutes writing each morning. Usually that means I’m writing one section per day until it’s done (roughly 2000 words).
That is my whole writing/content system for attracting 100-300 email subs per day (500-800 on peak days), bringing in more sponsorship opportunities than I know what to do with, and earning me 1-2k on top of my day job.
All by writing for 30-60 minutes every morning.
(I made over 4k from one newsletter I wrote last week).
I joined Substack in May 2025.
Before that, I had never written content before.
I had never even touched AI until I started writing content.
Every week did in fact feel like I was talking to a brick wall, but within 2 months I escaped beginner hell.
Escaping can take anywhere from 2 weeks to 20 years.
I don’t wish to scare you saying that.
In fact, this newsletter should excite you quite a lot.
I shared all those stats with you just a second ago because, firstly, it’s social proof, so I can give you a reason to trust me. Everybody wants to make money online, and a select few people do wish to make money by writing essays like this one.
But it also shared my stats to prove that this works if you stick with it.
And keep iterating with trial and error, with the right principles by your side, until it does end up working (which won’t take long).
I’m going to give you every one of those “right principles,” too.
If I can figure this out at 22, you can too.
Let me relieve you of some pain instantly:
You can ignore the “10 tips for optimizing growth” posts - They usually focus on low return-on-investment (ROI) tactics. Not the timeless principles and skills that will help you in the long-term, when context and obstacles inevitably come your way.
Ignore everyone asking for “follow for follow,” it earns you nothing - People will subscribe to you for your content if they believe it can help them change their life for the better.
Never prioritize volume over quality - Do less if less equals better. Posting 2 long-form posts per week might be “optimal for growth”... but content that people wake up excited to read each week is what attracts more of those people (content people engage with gets pushed, and people only engage with engaging content).
Forget the fucking algorithm - A terrible piece of content can get pushed in front of a million people and attract no attention because it’s terrible. That’s why we use persuasion principles, human psychology, and attention mechanisms, to make a piece of writing engaging and thus enjoyable to read. Think about what the word “engaging” actually means, in relation to the word “engagement” too for that matter.
No tricks, strategies, hacks, checklists - You need timeless principles that you can make your own. Most checklists (and I say “most”) won’t work long-term because algorithms and the types of content people want to read will change. I like checklists for helping you systematize and not forget to follow the timeless high-impact writing principles, which I will talk about more later :)
And one more thing...
No amount of profile optimization, sucking up to the algorithm, or posting consistently with a set frequency will EVER fix terrible writing you couldn’t pay someone to read.
We have now annihilated most of the generic (terrible) growth advice you will see online.
Let’s get to the good stuff.
Final Warning:
Early-bird pricing for The Profound Writer ends July 21st.
You have 2 days left until the 50% off discount disappears.
This is the last newsletter promoting this discount.
When it’s gone, it’s gone.
If you want a practical writing system for building an audience talking about your genuine interests and profound ideas, I’ll see you inside.
Sales promo over, back to the essay.
II - The Only Way To Escape Is Great Writing
A large, rapid-growing audience is a by-product of content people love.
Makes sense, right?
People don’t subscribe to you for your offer. Why would they? If they loved your digital product so much they would just pay you for it.
It’s content that attracts an audience, which you can then monetize with your offer.
Lots of business terms here, I know I know.
In simple words, you are literally just helping people through value exchange.
People will always read your content, no matter what, if they trust that you will be the person that can help them change their life for the better.
Content, newsletters, essays, long-form posts... whatever you want to call it.
It’s writing.
I’m being specific about long-form writing here, like I usually do.
Short-form feels a bit contaminated to me at the minute, so I avoid it. I use it to test ideas only when I feel like it.
For your work to be seen as valuable, you need people, and you also need those people to perceive your work as valuable.
How do you do that?
The first thing you need is attention. Nobody can deem your work as valuable if they can’t see it, or know that it even exists.
The second is content.
Writing and posting content is how you attract attention because all the attention is online (look around, everyone is on their phone, and you’re on a screen reading this).
Once you have captured attention with your content, you then convert that attention into interest, by using timeless high-impact writing principles, that encourage people to perceive the perspectives you have to offer inside of your content as valuable, so that they subscribe to you, and keep coming back for more.
You can read this post if you want help with understanding how people actually end up seeing ideas, things, or people as valuable.
It will teach you how you can give people a reason to care about anything you do or say (hint hint, that includes what you write about your content). Go read it before you make up your mind too quickly thanks to heuristics, and go comment on my YouTube saying that persuasion is unethical and bad.
So content is the answer to escaping beginner hell.
Content is how you attract people to your work, your offer, your interests, and your profound ideas.
If you were anything like me when I was starting out, as a total newbie, who had never tried online business before, and who had no interest in starting a “personal brand” (as cringy as I find that word), who also had no clue what to be fucking doing...
Start with content.
Just write one 2000 word newsletter every week. That’s all you need to start growing. Nothing more than that.
Once you start growing, you can figure everything else out while you grow.
A personal example, to flesh out my point:
I made my first digital product 6 months after I started writing one newsletter per week. I expanded upon one of my highest-performing long-form posts on the topic of reading, and turned it into a reading digital product.
Then, I followed the same process once more, and I made my self-education digital product.
Now I have my writing course. You get the idea.
Which now leads us to another idea worth thinking about:
If content is what gets you out of beginner hell, then why is your content not working?
There are two fundamental bottlenecks:
Your packaging (title, thumbnail, hook) is terrible
Your content (the ideas/writing itself) is terrible.
Usually it’s both.
Your packaging decides whether someone ends up clicking or not. If your packaging fails, nobody reads a single word of what you’ve written, no matter how good it is.
If nobody clicks, nobody reads.
Think about every creator, YouTube video, tweet, Instagram reel, or short-form post you scrolled by today. Everyone one of those posts failed to grab your attention.
Why is it that you ignore 99% of people you see online?
The answer is simple: you don’t fucking like what they post, and keep trying to shove in your face and sell you with their content.
It’s why I barely post short form posts, rarely promote my products (only now, close to launches), so my feed actually looks attractive to people who want to read my writing.
Content, then, is everything other than the packaging. Namely, the ideas you talk about.
What makes a piece of content terrible?
Said quickly, because this is getting long:
It has no structure.
The ideas aren’t fully thought through.
The sentences don’t make sense.
The key points aren’t solving specific problems relating to an overarching problem.
The content automatically assumes that because the writer cares about what they’ve written, so will the reader.
Nobody wants to read a terrible piece of content. That’s the point of this section. Sorry if I hurt anyone’s ego saying this.
As long as your content is at least not terrible, you’re fine.
I love Linkin Park, Three Days Grace, Breaking Benjamin, Deftones, and TOOL (if you couldn’t tell).
So why is it that my girlfriend loves Taylor Swift?
Value is subjective.
So once you have the right principles in place within your content, and your writing is above the standard of “terrible,” you’re good.
The bar, then, is between terrible writing and not-so-terrible writing.
It’s a subjective quality game if you writing is above terrible, and defined as not-so-terrible writing.
I hope this all made some sort of sense.
Here is the action plan!
III - How to escape beginner hell (with detailed instructions)
It’s not 10,000 hours. It’s 10,000 iterations.
- Naval
This is quite literally everything you will ever need to escape beginner hell.
I don’t agree with gatekeeping knowledge.
Yes, I am promoting The Profound Writer with this newsletter (50% off pricing ends in 2 days!).
But the course is only for people who are serious about having that extra-added help with execution of knowledge. And obviously, the course helps with a much larger picture than just “escaping beginner hell.”
Step 1: Ignore everything that isn’t high ROI
Most advice for growing online and building a personal brand is based on extremely low ROI tactics.
What do I mean by ROI?
It simply means return on investment.
Most of the advice (action steps) people online tell you to do, it gives you very little reward in relation to those actions steps.
Writing is the highest ROI thing you ca be doing.
Don’t forget that a single 2000 word newsletter can reach hundreds of thousands of people every week.
If you write 500 words a day, it’s done in four days, which requires only a 30-60 minute sprint of writing on each of those days, for hundreds of thousands of people to read your newsletter.
Which, you can plug your products/services into.
Designing your Substack bio and trying to nail it with the “I help X person achieve Y” formula... yeah.
People know what you do based on your content, your body of work, the web of knowledge you’ve built for them to explore.
Not a fucking bio.
If it’s not high ROI, like writing content, or building a product, then ignore it.
Trust me. You’ll be fine.
Writing is what you should be putting 80% of your time, effort, and focus into. Maybe more.
I need not repeat the benefits that writing content gives you.
Step 2: Learn to emulate (not copy)
You need to study high-performing content.
A lot of it.
Because if you want to write high-performing content yourself, you need to emulate high-performing content, before you can grasp what makes a piece of content capable of performing very well. Especially in the beginning when nobody trusts, cares, or knows about you.
I know what you’re thinking:
“But Craig! Isn’t that just stealing? Copying other peoples content and holding it as your own?”
Notice how I said the word emulate, and not copy, or stealing?
We want to extract the objective principles and mechanics that make a piece of high-performing content “work,” so to speak, so we can apply those same structural and mechanical principles to our own content, while writing about our own ideas.
That last bit is important.
It annoys me to see people writing content who can’t seem to mix the elements of art and business correctly.
They forget that writing is a two-player game. That you need attention before you can help people. That people aren’t going to care about what you write about unless you give them a beneficial reason to care by being persuasive and leveraging human psychology. And give them some sort of value for their time, energy, and focus.
Let’s go through an example.
How To Remember Everything You Read is one of my highest-performing newsletters across both Substack and YouTube.
If you were to search that exact title into YouTube, you would find lots of videos with that exact same title. They have millions of views. Did that mean I stole all those pieces of content?
God no.
Nobody owns the title “How To Remember Everything You Read.”
It’s a problem.
I used the title, yes. Because there is proven demand for that problem to be solved (high views and engagement). My perspective being offered on that title, however, that is uniquely my own.
Go read the post. I wrote about The Myth of Sisyphus, presented my shitty mind maps from reading it (as I was learning to mind map at the time). And also how interest/curiosity is one of the most neglected principles people forget to consider in life, and in learning.
So.
What if I was to take this post, which is one of my highest-performing newsletters with over 27k likes and 300k reads (and 149k views on YouTube), and did the following:
Asked AI to extract the objective principles and psychological mechanisms it uses?
What about the outline structure, that I can then use to outline my own argument, my own essay, talking about my own ideas?
Think of this like adopting a similar color palette as the Mona Lisa, but not repainting the Mona Lisa yourself and calling it your own.
That would be stealing. This here, is emulation.
You’re taking one objective mechanism that makes a piece or art (yes) look, feel, sound, or “work” so well, and using it to create something new.
NEW.
You can use this free prompt to help you out.
It’s a content evaluator prompt, and it’s one of many prompts you can find inside The Profound Writer. I explain how to use it at the top of the document.
Do what is proven to work and attract attention, so you can give yourself the chance to get people interested in your work, but in your unique way.
I’ve broken this next step into two parts.
You’ll understand why in a second.
Step 3A: Your packaging isn’t good enough
Attention precedes everything.
If nobody clicks, nobody reads.
You can forget about your ideas, your fancy stickman thumbnail drawings, your offer, and the hour or so of writing you spent each morning this week.
You need to learn to capture and maintain attention.
Non-negotiable.
How do you do this?
People aren’t going to like me saying this, but clickbait titles work for a reason.
That’s why everybody uses them. Your favorite creators included.
That’s why I wrote about The Myth of Sisyphus under the broad, beginner friendly, attention-grabbing title of How to become dangerously articulate, which is another one of my highest performers. And about self-education, learning to start a newsletter, physics, and learning science, all positioned under the (validated) title of How to become dangerously self-educated.
Those titles pissed a tiny fraction of people off (who would benefit from studying the levels of thinking), because they thought they were “clickbaity.”
They don’t understand the big picture.
And yet... they still clicked on those newsletters?
I captured their attention?
I maintained it for an entire video’s length until they engaged and left their “thoughtful” responses.
Sorry if I sound bitter haha. I’m not.
I don’t capture attention just to shit on people, other creators, address controversies, or ride on the back of trends. That is the cheapest (but often incredibly effective) way of getting tons of attention fast.
But it never lasts very long, and that attention disappears as soon as the controversies themselves do.
Play the long, honest game.
Let people willingly give you their attention because it’s you they want to hear about, and not the trends or the controversies. You’ll have a stronger following with more integrity than most if you do that.
Back on topic.
Your packaging comes down to 3 things:
Your title
Your thumbnail
Your hook (the first 3 sentences)
How to not fuck-up any of these:
A) Your title
Make it broad and suitable for beginners.
90% of people online are complete beginners in what you talk about in your content, and most people scroll to avoid boredom. They scroll without any search intent.
Please spend 3 hours thinking about that.
Jargon and esoteric/abstract wording alienates a lot of people.
Have a look at all my newsletters. See how they’re all beginner friendly titles? A 12 year old could understand what every one of them mean.
Don’t be afraid to emulate other peoples titles.
To restate my example, I wrote How to become dangerously articulate as a title because I knew it was broad, anyone could understand it, and, it’s a pattern interrupt and a curiosity loop (I’ll explain the sentence mechanisms shortly).
Since that title did so well, I emulated it.
How to become dangerously self-educated is another one of my highest-performing posts, which got me a ton of sales because it got a ton of attention to a CTA I had within that newsletter (I had just released my self-education guide at the time, and I persuaded people of the value of self-education, and my novel perspective on it).
What if you wrote about the following topics?
How to become dangerously productive
How to become dangerously good at writing
How to become a dangerously smart at thinking
How to become dangerously good at personal branding (by writing essays)
I might use some of those...
B) Your thumbnail
I like to draw stickman thumbnails on my Substack because I think they’re cool.
In all honesty, I’m not the worlds greatest thumbnail designer.
Like with creating titles, YouTube and trial and error will be your best friend.
Writing hooks however, is something I have way more expertise in.
C) Your hook
As a general rule, I like to start my first 3 lines (the first 5 seconds) using any mix of the following sentence mechanisms:
Pattern Interrupt - A bold claim that goes against the reader’s expectations
Curiosity Loop - Temporarily withholding information to create curiosity and interest
Visual Cue - A concrete visual that the reader can imagine (a place, thing, location, memory, person, a specific visual description)
Sometimes it’s in that order. Sometimes it’s not.
This is a general principle I follow because I have found success with it consistently with my content.
You need to be starting every long-form post you wrote with a pattern interrupt. I believe that is a non-negotiable.
It shatters expectations. It feels nice to read. And, it’s a hell of a lot more impactful than starting with a question.
Step 3B: Your content isn’t good enough
Human psychology, attention mechanics, and persuasion principles are themselves timeless, objective principles that do not change.
Why is this important to grasp?
You see, tactics become obsolete the second an algorithm changes.
Timeless, objective principles do not change.
Because human psychology is human psychology, regardless if you’re at home, on Instagram, or at work.
If you understand the principles of persuasion, attention mechanics, and human psychology, you can write about any problem you want and get people to care.
I want to go through what I call the profound sentence mechanisms.
The word mechanism simply means “why” something works. So what is happening mechanically, like a cog moving in a machine, to achieve a certain outcome (ex: a sentence feels like a mindfuck to read).
Here they all are, in the order of how I like to write my key point sections (I use a what-why-how framework, explained below):
What Is The Profound Idea/Problem of This Section?
Profound Idea - A bold claim.
Reframe - An existing belief is stated before offering a new perspective on it
Problem / Pain Point - A pain or problem the reader is facing
Pattern Interrupt - Breaks expectations with an impactful idea
Personal Experience - A personal story or experience where you overcame or suffered from a problem
Quote / Statistic - Borrowed authority, which adds instant credibility
Curiosity Loop - Information that is temporarily being withheld for engaging effect
Why Is It True?
Concept - Explaining a named idea, concept, or framework
Insight - A non-obvious truth (often a reframe)
Metaphor / Analogy - Makes abstract ideas simple to understand through making them relatable
Anecdote - A short story illustrating a point
What / How / Why Question - Questions to ask that deepen or extend an idea, also considered to be loops
How Does It Benefit the Reader’s Life?
Consequence / Implication - Exploring the (often negative) consequences or the (beneficial) meaning of an idea
Action Step - Give an action step on how to benefit and apply the idea in daily life
Curiosity Loop - Once again
Challenge - Make the reader question themselves on something
Now.
What do you actually write about?
Step 4: Write 2000 words per week
You only need to post one long form post each week to grow consistently.
You don’t need to post 3-5x short form posts per day... because what is 3-5 short form posts without considering the quality of what you’re posting?
The thing is, you have no idea what quality is. Only your audience knows that. And as long as your writing is above terrible, it’s up to you to figure out what quality is.
Emulation will help you avoid dropping below into the standard of “terrible.”
Here’s how you do this practically:
Choose a topic you can’t stop thinking about - Self-explanatory
Write 2000 words about the topic - Following a problem → solution outline. Address the problem, why the reader should care about it, a new perspective and the unique knowledge needed to view the problem differently, and the novel action steps for overcoming the problem
Make your title attention grabbing, broad, and beginner friendly - You need to market your post as valuable so other people decide to click. Remember that 90% of people are beginners and will be scrolling with zero search intent
I only say one long form post each week and nothing about short form for a few reasons:
Long form is higher leverage - it builds trust faster, and solves problems with more depth than a 200 word Substack note could
You own your audience - If you send your long-form posts to an email list via a newsletter. I recommend Substack, I’m down bad for it, and you don’t need to use short form as a traffic mechanism (a way to get people to discover, see, and thus read your long form). You can simply post long form directly to Substack and it can get seen by hundreds of thousands. No short form posts needed.
This is my content system in its entirety.
One long-form post per week that I’ve put a lot of thinking and focus into, across a full week, and the odd short form post here and there whenever I feel like it.
I record a YouTube video one day per week by reading my long-form post to a camera.
God I’ve said the word long-form so much in this section it’s actually annoying now.
Step 5: Double down on what works, until you find the next new thing that works, and repeat
Engagement tells you what your audience finds engaging.
Do more of what your audience wants.
For example, I turned a high-performing post on reading into a reading digital product.
I’ve made over 1k from it.
I turned a paid guide from my Substack paid-tier into The Profound Self-Education Guide, and I made more than 4k from it.
My writing course, same thing. Made over 4k from my first week of promoting it.
Long-form content works to create an excellent backlog of brilliant ideas that can be turned into products.
I plan to build a learning course in the next 6 months, because nobody fucking teaches you about learning science. And, all my posts talking about that profound idea go viral and semi-viral across Substack and YouTube.
If I made it, I know it would do quite well.
Going back to beginner hell specifically, when I was in stuck in it, I wrote about the topic of learning quite a lot, and those posts got me out of beginner hell.
But I didn’t keep talking about learning.
I pivoted by continually testing out new ideas.
I see that a lot, with people escaping beginner hell by talking about “self-education,” or they write one good post on writing... and niche fucking hard on that one topic.
What about range?
Reach?
This will make sense to you eventually. It just will.
But once it does happen, and you strike gold for the first time, you need to experiment so it can keep happening. So you can keep striking gold with new topics.
Feel free to look at my previous long-form posts to see how I did it.
Step 6: Build a web of knowledge people can explore
Your mind is your niche.
Forget about trying to build (annoying) email marketing campaigns or (even more annoying ) sales funnels.
One post per week, writing about a topic you want to learn about.
2000 words.
A personal brand is no different to self-education. Your body of work (or your content... if you want the boring term) is quite literally a growing web of knowledge people can explore.
Think about it.
When you read a book from Jung or Nietzsche, you’re walking around inside their head.
When you read something, you become the person who wrote it.
I’m writing this current sentence with a mocha in my hand while hiding at my day job. I feel pretty tired, I stayed up late last night, but this is what I am thinking right now. That is what writing is. It’s formalized thinking.
Sorry for getting a bit abstract.
One long-form post connects to your social account, which contains everything you have ever written. Like a world people can explore.
People subscribe to you for your perspectives.
If people wanted any-old information, they could ask their buddy ChatGPT or Claude.
You wouldn’t expect to look like a Greek statue after one gym session. You need to expose yourself to that right type of stimulus consistently.
That’s why people need a body of work to devour across days, weeks, and months.
Not a fucking funnel. We are writers, here. Not corporate salesmen.
Step 7: Everything starts with content
You might still be expecting the part where I say build a product and to network like mad.
Let me start with networking.
I have never networked, in the traditional sense. I’m very shy as a person, and the idea of cold messaging people for the literal purpose of “networking” just feels alien to me.
The only networking “tip” I have is to be a fucking human.
How do you message your friends?
Your girlfriend or boyfriend (behave now)?
The lads before your weekly gathering?
Let me tell you about Conquer.
He reached out to me when I just started writing, I had a few hundred subs back then.
And we just... talked.
About writing, the creative process, and things we both had an interest in.
He wasn’t like the hundreds of other emails/DM requests looking to sell me something I didn’t want, or offer me sponsorships to promote things I didn’t believe in, or anything else that wasn’t mutually beneficial.
If you want to network, just chat with people.
And sound like a fucking human being for gods sake.
Regarding the idea of product, I’ve made 3 of them... “officially.”
Technically this newsletter is a product. As are all my guides on my paid Substack. And every short and long-form post I have ever created.
Content is what’s called minimum-viable product (MVP).
It’s a product that is quick and easy to distribute and get instant feedback on.
Which means: A product is simply a solution to a problem.
Content is the same.
I already spoke about the validation ladder that you can copy yourself:
best short/long-form posts → paid newsletter/lead magnets → digital products → courses
It all starts with:
Writing.
Great.
Content.
Step 8: Systematize the objective, timeless principles
If you don’t want to forget to include a certain principle in your writing each week, incorporate it into some sort of template.
Here is a free long-form writing template/checklist you can use to get you started.
It contains everything you need to write one long-form newsletter every week, from start to finish, and it includes a checklist to make sure you’ve hit the right principles.
Fill it out throughout the week while coming up with ideas and researching while on walks.
Have it open beside you while you write, or use it to edit your writing after you have written a complete newsletter.
Add principles that you yourself don’t want to forget to include, and build your own unique template from there.
This is just one type of template you can use, destroy, and rebuild but suited to how you like to write newsletters.
Enjoy my friend.
IV - Use this prompt I made
I have given you everything I could possibly give you for escaping beginner hell.
But I’d like to give you one last thing to make escaping as certain as can be.
Here is another free prompt from The Profound Writer that you can use as a checklist to make sure your content contains the necessary principles required to launch yourself out of it.
Copy and paste the prompt into Claude and give it your finished long-form post draft.
Here it is:
The instructions explaining what the prompt is and how to use it are at the top of the doc. This is getting long, so I’ll let you explore that for yourself.
This was a beast of a newsletter.
Which is understandable, since I tried my best to solve this problem in the most bulletproof way I can conceive of.
Come back to this newsletter. Save or bookmark it. Use it as a one-stop-shop solution to overcoming beginner hell.
One final time:
The Profound Writer early-bird pricing ends in 2 days.
July 21st.
This is the final time I will be promoting the 50% off discounted pricing.
If you want to learn how to write great long-form content people can’t resist reading, and build an audience online writing about your own interests and profound ideas, you can save yourself $75 dollars here.
You’re an absolute legend.
Catch you in a few days.
- Craig :)
My question is I heard long form only goes towards your subscribers not to the main page, so if that is true would you only need to focus on the notes or “short form” first until you gain a following?
Or try and maximize both ?
Great article!
Love the prompts you shared!